make wow money

With regard to the game caused the problem is not whether the executive branch to reach a consensus, but rather the examination and approval system itself.

November 2, 2009, Press and Publication wow gold Administration issued a circular, due to net trading companies did not pass, "World of Warcraft" pre-approval on an open operating without permission, to a new player account fees and registration, Press and Publication Administration will be terminated "World of Warcraft," for approval, back on the introduction of publication of "World of Warcraft" application.

Also, version of Office will be made as appropriate according to their corresponding administrative punishments,cheap wow gold  including suspension of their Internet access service.

However, the same right to have the approval of the Ministry of Culture in a subsequent press briefing, said: Press and Publication Administration to terminate net easy "World of Warcraft," for approval, clearly belongs to ultra vires acts, the Ministry of Culture is the real regulatory network games. Department of the Ministry of Culture's response was: "Punishment net easy reasoned."

When the two departments struggle stalled when the net is easy also the victims. On the one hand its public operations have been July 21 this year, received permission from the Ministry of Culture, on the other, "World of Warcraft" up to now has invested over 200 million U.S. dollars, but it has not much in return. Seeing a few hundred million yuan of revenue per day from the immediate passage of time, pursuing the interests of the commercial nature of promoting net easy "desperate", to bypass the Department's pre-approval. This can not but makes the "World of Warcraft" in China's destiny Nieyibahan.

From "NINETOWNS and NetEase proxy fight" to "JIA Peng incident" to today's "fairy fighting", a "World of Warcraft," the press manufactured in 2009 how much din? Game industry is one of the most profitable industry, "World of Warcraft" is the most profitable industry in the most profitable one game, so, surrounded by a "benefit" of the word in all aspects of the industry chain becomes distraught up .

"Athletes in the arena fighting, can follow the rules of the game to deal with; But if there the same venue two or more referees, each referee rules of the game is different, and even playing referee between the planes come, then this event will also how to play go? "Information Research Center of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told reporters the Secretary-General Jiang Qiping. In his view, "World of Warcraft incident" caused by "bull management" is just the phenomenon, in essence, because despite the vigorous development of online games in China has, but the relevant aspects and not in the "game rules" to reach a consensus. Absence of consensus, which have led to the emergence of various conflicts.

The so-called "consensus" now appears to be of course argued for their own Department and the Ministry of Culture. However, from another perspective, the biggest problem lies in the executive branch is not yet reached a consensus, but the examination and approval system itself.

Based on previous media reports, an audit has been "World of Warcraft," the Press and Publication Administration experts have talked about how the approval process of the game: usually by three experts, holding the highest level of the game account and password to enter the game. However, playing games is like entering a real life, in which the system, set up, procedures, and the scene is extremely complex, even a professional reviewer, experienced only a one particular way of life, he in the game by just walk the path of a certain situations, perhaps he can be seen on the surface of things, ordered the game will change the game in the skeleton of the box, the bones of the dead into the grave, but never found in the pre-approval of all problems.

If the current mode, waiting for the experts to all the "life path" are completed, and all the bad content Eurya out, and then decide whether it should be open operation, then this game to be available on Monkey Ma. Therefore, the experts themselves admit that both the way the current audit, or review the content, and even includes the examination of the length of time in which the flaws are many.

Moreover, the Department has reviewed each year so many games, the assessment criteria, then what is? Further, a game in China for many years, in the hands NINETOWNS operated for many years, its content does not make any changes to a more competent units are re-examine the six months is still not adopted. This not only makes the current audit system is a reasonable doubt, and even lead to other people's curiosity, to explore what the real motive behind the competent authorities is.

Of course, the game is certainly to be regulated. However, regulatory approaches, the need to convert ideas? There is no absolutely perfect system, but there should be a better system.

For example, game products, you can develop a hierarchical outline of the principles of the executive branch to set classification, as the legal system in the Constitution, the same; third-party organization which established the rules for the operation in more detail. Accordingly, the game rating. But ultimately, in the end what will happen when a game is concerned, this thing is to "the masses" - players - to be discovered. Therefore, we can consider setting up some sort of reporting system - telephone hotline or web site can be reported. If the operation found a problem, the initial warning, a fine of recidivism, the three guilty of the shut down.

In this way, may be able to avoid the assessment criteria caused by the non-uniform "trick", but also allows companies feel insecure, players can all be convinced by that time, maybe you do not power out of a fairy fight.